<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Governor vetoes paint stewardship bill</title>
	<link>http://looncommons.org/2008/05/16/governor-vetoes-paint-stewardship-bill/</link>
	<description>A forum for current and emerging environmental and conservation issues in Minnesota.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://looncommons.org/2008/05/16/governor-vetoes-paint-stewardship-bill/#comment-48273</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://looncommons.org/2008/05/16/governor-vetoes-paint-stewardship-bill/#comment-48273</guid>
					<description>He is majorly veto-happy this session.

I am majorly unhappy with many of his red pen waivings.

This 40 cent fee would have actually required those who create the environmental impact to pay for its mitigation.  So simple, so direct, and so inexpensive.

Am I the only voter these days who thinks Pawlenty is wildly unreasonable??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is majorly veto-happy this session.</p>
<p>I am majorly unhappy with many of his red pen waivings.</p>
<p>This 40 cent fee would have actually required those who create the environmental impact to pay for its mitigation.  So simple, so direct, and so inexpensive.</p>
<p>Am I the only voter these days who thinks Pawlenty is wildly unreasonable??
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
