Download Video

High school senior Lily Andrews wants to improve the environment and the economy, so she and her friends gathered to write letters to Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty to ask him to create green jobs. Want to learn more about green jobs? Check out this video and contact Joshua Low at 612.659.9124 x 311.

[video http://think.mtv.com/044FDFFFF0098A1400017009913C2/ MTV Covers the Story] 

High school senior Lily Andrews wants to improve the environment and the economy, so she and her friends gathered to write letters to Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty to ask him to create green jobs. Want to learn more about green jobs? Check out this video and contact Joshua Low at 612.659.9124 x 311.

Interesting comments from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on the practice of washing coal and other residue off freighters into the Great Lakes.

“Minnesota solid waste rules prohibit the disposal of solid waste into waters of the state of Minnesota, including Lake Superior,” said Paul Eger, assistant commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, in a letter to the Coast Guard.

Eger disputed the Coast Guard’s claim that cargo residues washed off ships sink quickly and do not harm water quality.

By J. Drake Hamilton, science policy director, Fresh Energy

Is America losing its competitive edge in science, medicine, engineering, and energy? According to a June 2008 poll conducted on behalf of Scientists and Engineers for America, 85 percent of Americans want Presidential candidates to debate science issues. Voters want public policy decisions to be based on science. And voters are more likely to vote for a candidate who will tackle climate change.

Will candidates discuss—in detail—policies to confront global warming and build a new energy economy? Will this be an innovation presidency?

A new citizen-led initiative named Science Debate 2008 is calling for a presidential debate on science. It has the support of nearly every major American science organization, dozens of Nobel Prize winners, business leaders, and the presidents of over 100 major U.S. universities. From over 3,300 potential questions submitted for consideration, the leading organizations agreed on the top 14 questions the candidates should answer. They crafted questions broad enough to allow for wide variations in responses, but sufficiently specific to help guide the discussion of many of the most important unresolved challenges currently facing the United States.

Take a look at the questions, and start asking them of candidates for president and for congress. Let’s help make sure we know every candidate’s positions on climate policy, renewable energy research and deployment, and other critical issues in the new energy economy.

Interesting comments from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on the practice of washing coal and other residue off freighters into the Great Lakes.

“Minnesota solid waste rules prohibit the disposal of solid waste into waters of the state of Minnesota, including Lake Superior,” said Paul Eger, assistant commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, in a letter to the Coast Guard.

Eger disputed the Coast Guard’s claim that cargo residues washed off ships sink quickly and do not harm water quality.

By J. Drake Hamilton, science policy director, Fresh Energy

Is America losing its competitive edge in science, medicine, engineering, and energy? According to a June 2008 poll conducted on behalf of Scientists and Engineers for America, 85 percent of Americans want Presidential candidates to debate science issues. Voters want public policy decisions to be based on science. And voters are more likely to vote for a candidate who will tackle climate change. (more…)

By Daryl Sager, energy justice program associate, Fresh Energy

Last Thursday, the Environmental Justice and Climate Change Initiative and Redefining Progress released a report entitled “A Climate of Change: African Americans, Global Warming, and a Just Climate Policy for the U.S.” The report highlights the fact that African Americans are disproportionately affected by climate change and stand to lose more from bad policy and gain more from good policy. (more…)

It may be July, but the Star Tribune gave some of the biggest agribusiness firms around a nice Valentines on July 21. On the opinion page, the newspaper’s editorial board lauded firms like Cargill and CHS for using all the tools at their disposal to “feed the world.” At one point, the Star Tribune editorial made a plea to readers on behalf of the big boys when it opined that Cargill would just like the government to “let free markets work their magic.” That’s a real gag-inducer. Or, as William Pappas wrote in a July 25 letter-to-the-editor: “I was struck dumb by your July 21 lead editorial.” Here’s a hint at the kind of free-market magic Cargill has conjured: It and three other firms now control at least 83 percent, 66 percent and 55 percent, respectively, of the nation’s beef, pork and turkey slaughter, according to the University of Missouri’s most recent “Concentration of Agricultural Markets” report. Three firms control 55 percent of flour milling. Guess who’s No. 1 on that list? A partnership between Cargill and CHS. According to conventional economic wisdom, when four firms control more than 40 percent of a market, it’s no longer a competitive one. This isn’t about allowing the laws of supply and demand to rule, and it’s certainly not about feeding hungry people. It’s about the kind of market control that forces farmers to take whatever price is offered and consumers to pay whatever is demanded. When seeking that kind of control, Cargill and its ilk want one kind of magic — a disappearing act on the part of fair competition.

You can pass into law the greatest policy in the world, but in the end its success depends on good implementation. Exhibit A: When the “Livestock Investment Grants Program” was passed during the last legislative session, it showed that at least on paper Minnesota was serious about helping farmers of all types who need a little help tweaking their operations here and there in order to increase efficiency, profitability and environmental sustainability. LSP and other groups were even successful in making sure that farmers making improvements to grazing operations could obtain funds, and that low cost projects could qualify. But on July 1, when the Minnesota Department of Agriculture announced it was accepting applications, it became clear that this wasn’t your Legislature’s Livestock Investment Grants Program anymore. The MDA has developed qualification criteria that skew the program towards larger operators that may have existing environmental problems. As the criteria read now, a small- or medium-sized family farm using sustainable production systems to maintain current environmental excellence is less likely to qualify. This was not the intention of the original legislation. (more…)

By Rachel Wilf, MEP Civic Engagement Project Intern

On June 13th I traveled in a minivan for four and a half hours through the rolling hills of northern Minnesota. The destination? The White Earth Pow Wow in White Earth, MN. The goal of the MEP field team? Register 40 voters for the upcoming election. (more…)